At the end of the day I think they're both good tints and it's a personal decision which one you prefer. In terms of appearance, the CR40 has a noticeable bronze tint while the CXP is a standard neutral gray. One tint shop I visited did have a heat lamp gizmo set up and the CR did pass noticeably less heat, but who knows how well that translates to actual solar heat gain? I haven't had my 335i for a Phoenix summer yet so I can't comment on how it does vs the CXP in the X5. I just mention it as something I noticed in case that sort of thing would bug you. It's really not a big deal and you don't notice it when looking straight through the windows, just at an angle. The CR feels more "clear" if that makes any sense. That is, you're aware there's film there. The CXP has a bit of "thick" look to it when looking through a window at an angle. We have CXP 35 on my wife's X5 and CR 40 on my 335i. Infrared Transmission (1090 Nanometers): <17% Infrared Transmission (1600 Nanometers): <11% In case you don't know you can find the specs of the two products in tables like these: They're both good products, and I'd just as soon save some bucks here. With tints in that lighter category the 3M crystalline loses some of its advantage of being a "see-through dark tint". I have no problem using the CXP 45 or 55 for the other windows. I'm planning on using CXP 80 for my windshield mainly because it's the lightest tint I could find, the price is good, and the CXP is their top of the line product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |